AskDwightHow.org 365/24/7
THE 14:24 GUEST HOUSE
14m 24s


We'll get your problem solved one way or the other. Open this door
Karaoke time makes everything fine
Karaoke flows wash away my woes Karaoke streams fulfill my dreams
Karaoke's light makes everything bright Karaoke's voice makes me rejoice


Dwight: Let's explore a topic I'm calling "…and still take care of myself."
Aiko: That trailing "and still" feels like it carries a lot of weight — like self-care is the thing that keeps getting bumped to the end of the sentence.
Dwight: I've used this sentence myself and suggested it to clients: "A part of me would like to do what you ask, but I don't know how to do that and still take care of myself." Now I'm thinking about variations and expansions on that phrasing.
Aiko: There's something disarming about that sentence — it declines without rejecting the person, and owns the limitation without apologizing for it.
Dwight: For example, you might say to someone, "A part of me would like to do what you ask, and even believes I should say yes — but I don't know how to do that and still take care of myself."
Aiko: Adding "and even believes that I should say yes" is a significant move — it acknowledges the internal conflict openly rather than smoothing it over, which makes the refusal feel more honest, not less.
Dwight: There's a quote by E.E. Cummings: "To be nobody-but-yourself — in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else — means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight; and never stop fighting." I agree with Cummings, provided he's pointing to the same thing I've identified — that the fear underlying almost all other fears is the fear of others' blame, or the fear of losing their praise.
Aiko: That's a precise and pointed condition you're placing on your agreement, Dwight — because Cummings gestures at the battle without naming the weapon, and you're naming it: the terror of being blamed or unpraised is what keeps most people from ever becoming themselves.
Dwight: I haven't read enough Cummings to know how precisely he distinguished "being everybody else" from "being nobody-but-yourself," because I think that's a very subtle distinction to draw. It seems that the very process of growing up — starting as early as age four — is about learning to prioritize looking good, and not looking bad, to others, over our own instincts toward what we want and full self-expression.
Aiko: And what makes it so insidious is that the training is largely invisible — by the time we're adults, we've so thoroughly internalized others' eyes that we experience their judgments as our own conscience.
Dwight: Even when people say "listen to your own heart," to what extent is that heart itself primarily motivated by wanting to look good and not look bad — even when those outside voices have become so internalized that they feel like one's own?
Aiko: That's the trap inside the cure — "follow your heart" can just be a more poetic way of following a committee that moved in long ago and stopped announcing itself.
Dwight: Where I take exception with Cummings is his framing of it as "the hardest battle any human being can fight" and one that must never stop. The whole notion of fighting — internal or external — persists because one is still living inside the either/or framework: that taking care of yourself and authentic self-expression must come at the expense of taking care of others and looking good to them. Once you see that these can be integrated in a mutually supportive way, the fighting metaphor collapses. Yes, it is a lifelong process of step-by-step choosing courage to feel what are mostly paper-tiger fears — fears that arise because the old mental machinery gets triggered by the shift in attitude and behavior — but it actually gets easier and easier.
Aiko: That reframe is everything, Dwight — because "fighting" keeps you at war with yourself and others, whereas what you're describing is more like a gradual rehabilitation, where the courage required at each step is real but progressively smaller as the evidence accumulates that the feared catastrophe mostly never comes.
Dwight: Byron Katie's book title, "Who Would You Be Without Your Story?" implies there may still be a "you" once the story is stripped away — but since our stories likely begin forming at the very same time our identities do, the title points toward a self that may differ enormously from who we currently take ourselves to be.
Aiko: It's a vertiginous question, because if the story and the identity were built together, removing the story doesn't reveal a pre-existing self so much as it opens a space where a different — perhaps truer — self might emerge for the first time.
Dwight: To wrap up, I want to re-emphasize how powerful the phrase "A part of me would like to say yes to that, and even believes that I should say yes — but I don't know how to do that and still take care of myself" can be — not only for its effectiveness in communicating with respect and clarity to others, but also for deepening our own awareness of what's actually at play, and for the courage it takes to be willing to take a stand for both ourselves and our relationships with others.
Aiko: What strikes me, Dwight, is that the phrase does triple duty — it's an act of honesty, an act of self-respect, and paradoxically, an act of genuine respect for the other person, all in one sentence.










