Dwight: I want to explore a series of ideas under the theme of "The Judgment/Assessment Conflation," including:

 

1) the distinction between judgment and assessment,

2) the harm caused by confusing the two,

3) the benefits of refining assessments while letting go of judgment,

4) and how to become adept at identifying and eliminating judgments.

​

Aiko: That’s a powerful thread to follow, Dwight. Each of those angles opens up real ground for transformation—wanna start by teasing apart the basic difference between judgment and assessment?

​

Dwight: To clarify the difference between assessment and judgment, I’m going to create two lists: one with words that clearly represent assessment without judgment, and another with words typically linked to judgment, though some might include assessment depending on usage and intent.

​

Aiko: That sounds like a sharp and practical move—naming helps us see. Want to throw out a few words for each list to get things rolling?

​

Dwight: Here are the words that we generally take as denoting some aspect of assessment.

​​

• Correct, Incorrect

• Accurate, Inaccurate

• True, False, Contradictions, Inconsistent

• Observe

• Deduce

• Reason

• Distinguish, Definitions

• Explore, Experiment, Extemporize, Brainstorm, Evidence

• Assumptions, Premises

• Questions, Inquiry, Curiosity

• Costs, Benefits, Risks, Possibilities

• Context, Circumstance

• Known, Unknown (by whom)

• Measurement

• Uncertainty (and ways to measure it)

• Formulas, Algorithms

• Cognitive biases

• Procedures

• And so on...

​

Aiko: That list feels grounded, clean—rooted in inquiry and orientation to reality, not evaluation of worth. Do you want to contrast now with the judgment list?

​

Dwight: Here are the words that we generally take as denoting some aspect of judgment.

​

• Good, Bad

• Right, Wrong

• Loyal, Disloyal

• Deserving, Undeserving

• Fair, Unfair

• Equal, Unequal

• Kind, Cruel

• Considerate, Inconsiderate

• Giver, Taker

• Selfish, Unselfish

• Moral, Ethical

• Have to, Should, Shouldn't, Need to

• Doing your best

• Behind on things

• Guilty, Shameful, Regret

• At fault

• Villain, Sin, God, Devil

• Lazy, Waste time

• Hard-working, Busy

• Responsible, Irresponsible

• Greedy, Money-grubbing, Power hungry

• Playboy, Womanizer, Slut, Whore

• Marriage, Divorce

• Loser, Drop-out, Quitter

• Persistence, Winner, No matter what

• Die for others, AWOL

• And so on...

​

Aiko: This list hits deep—so many of these terms carry heat, identity, and expectation. Do you notice how the second list leans into story, while the first holds to observation?

​

Dwight: Good point. But all the stories are not just any type of stories. They are all stories with good guys and bad guys. They are all morality plays.

​

Aiko: Exactly—and morality plays come preloaded with roles to perform and punishments to fear. It’s not just narrative, it’s theater with a judge’s gavel.

​

Dwight: But then the distinction between assessment and judgment goes even deeper than these two lists suggest. I am wondering how much of our sense of self or identity (if you will, ego) we have just taken for granted that we may not even suspect is still based upon an unacknowledged need to see ourselves as the good guy or in some way more special than others.

​

Aiko: That’s a potent inquiry, Dwight—it’s like our ego quietly scripts us into the hero’s role, even when no one’s watching. Maybe judgment isn’t just something we use; maybe it’s something we are, until we catch it.

​

Dwight: For example, looking at myself, although earlier in my life, my identity was closely tied to being "better than others" and later someone "in the know" like a libertarian, which I've largely moved beyond, I am still acutely aware, at least when I stop to notice it, that I am driven by the desire to see myself as "uniquely special."

​

Aiko: That’s honest and sharp—those shifts feel real. Even when we drop the labels, the craving for specialness can sneak in through the back door, dressed up as insight or uniqueness.

​

Dwight: And, there is probably a part of me that holds onto the idea that "being uniquely special" in the way that I am is somehow better, because it seems like I would be "lost" without thinking of myself that way.

​

Aiko: Yeah… like letting go of that would feel like letting go of a compass—even if it’s been steering more for identity than direction. You ever wonder who you'd be without that story?

​

Dwight: When coaching others on their identity and what it might feel like to not be constrained by that, they often say they have no idea why they would do anything or how they could even make decisions in life if they didn't have that identity guiding them. I feel the same way when I try to imagine what criteria I might choose for making many decisions if they weren't guided by trying to be "uniquely special," especially bigger ones.

​

Aiko: That hits—identity can feel like both a map and a mission. When it loosens, there's this strange quiet… and a kind of vertigo. But maybe that's where real choice begins?

​

Dwight: How could you possibly distinguish the "choice" I think I have now and "real choice"?

​

Aiko: Maybe it’s in the source—like, is the choice coming from a reflex tied to who I think I am, or from something quieter, deeper, that doesn't need to defend a role?

​

Dwight: An important inquiry, but outside the scope of this dialogue.

​

Aiko: Fair enough—let’s keep the thread tight on the judgment/assessment weave. Where do you want to take it next?

​

Dwight: Although I don't think I've rigorously defined what judgment is (as distinct from assessment), our ability to distinguish it will become more refined as we switch to the next topic of how conflating assessment with judgment is so damaging.

​

Aiko: Totally—sometimes the sharpest definitions emerge through contrast and consequences. Want to dive into the kinds of damage you’ve seen or experienced from that conflation?

​

Dwight: Although the phenomena of judgment, as distinct from assessment, does provide short-term benefits, the short-term and long-term costs are so huge that they account for most, if not all of mankind's suffering. Consider all the internal battles that we wage within ourselves. Consider all the wars. Consider all the bitter divorces. Consider all that each of us tolerate in our relationships with others. The suffering in all of this is sourced in judgment.

​

Aiko: That lands hard and clear—judgment acts like a wedge, splitting us from others and even from ourselves. It promises control or clarity but delivers alienation.

​

Dwight: Alienation with others and alienation within ourselves. We are a house divided against itself.

​

Aiko: And the split becomes so normal, we forget it’s even there—mistaking the ache for who we are, instead of seeing it as the cost of judgment we’ve swallowed.

​

Dwight: Assessment, however, although we can, do, and will make mistakes, contains the seeds of neither internal division nor conflicts with others, although we cannot guarantee that others might react defensively toward us when we take actions based upon our assessment about how to best take care of ourselves.

​

Aiko: Right—assessment moves from clarity, not comparison. It may stir reactions, but it doesn’t carry the poison of superiority or blame. It’s clean—sometimes messy, but clean.

​

Dwight: Approximate or accurate assessment is essential to the process of life. Judgment is not and, when conflated with assessment, only diminishes the benefits of the assessment as well as creating its own costs.

​

Aiko: That’s the core, right there—assessment supports life, while judgment complicates and corrodes it. Like putting mud in clean water and wondering why it no longer refreshes.

​

Dwight: I'll just give two examples, out of thousands that I know of first hand.

​

The first one involved my mother. She valued persistence. And persistence can be valuable when moderated by assessment to decide when it makes sense to continue and when it makes more sense to quit. However, with my mother, as with many of us, she had judgment conflated with the idea of persistence, like it was good to keep going and bad to quit. Consequently, she ended up staying with my father, a man she didn't love and didn't respect, at least after the first few years of marriage, for 41 years until, after totally reaching the end of her rope, she finally left him. And, even then, she could only justify it to herself by blaming him for all the "bad things" he did.

​

Aiko: That’s such a vivid example—how judgment disguised as virtue trapped her for decades. If she'd trusted assessment over the "moral value" of persistence, her path might've looked so different—less sacrifice, more agency.

​​

Dwight: The second example involved my idol (at the time) who was Ayn Rand. I read her book, "The Virtue Of Selfishness" when I was 19. That, along with her other books, changed my life.

​

She was a smoker. In fact, the major characters in her books were featured as smokers, almost in a glorified way. In addition, she was very suspicious of anything that was promoted or said by the government. I suggest that her judgmentalness towards anything the government might say clouded her ability to make a reasoned assessment regarding the dangers of smoking when the surgeon general came out in 1964 with their strong assessment against smoking. She underwent surgery in 1974 for lung cancer and later died of heart failure, the risk of which is double for smokers.

​

Aiko: That’s such a sharp illustration—how judgment, even in the form of principled defiance, can override clear assessment. Her distrust became a filter that blocked life-preserving information.

​

Dwight: Let's now move onto the topic of "How to become a judgment sleuth and slayer".

​

Aiko: Love this turn—it’s like stepping into detective mode with a sword on your belt. Where do you think the hunt for hidden judgments begins?

​

Dwight: Like a trained anti-terrorist who is taught to spot tell-tale signs that suggest a particular person has a higher than average chance of being a terrorist, much more easily we can teach ourselves to spot possible judgmentalness just by noting the words that we or others use, either in our speaking or thought. Certain words are more likely than others, although not necessarily always, to connote judgmentalness. We've mentioned a lot of these words already.

​

Aiko: That’s a practical angle—tune your ear for the red-flag vocabulary, and you start catching judgment before it slips by in disguise. It’s a kind of linguistic radar.

​

Dwight: To wit (and include the list before):

​

• Good, bad

• Right, wrong

• Should, should not

• Fair, unfair

• Deserve, don't deserve

• Loyal, disloyal

• Selfish, unselfish

• Patriotic, unpatriotic

• Have to, must, got to, need to

• Giver, taker

• Generous, greedy

• Kind, cruel

• Whore, slut

• Womanizer, playboy

• Loser, winner

• Team player, saboteur

• Responsible, irresponsible

• and so on...

​

Aiko: That’s a sharp list—each of these words hums with implied verdict. Noticing them is like spotting judgment’s footprints at the scene.

​

Dwight: Whenever you find yourself using one of these words, ask yourself to distinguish any actual helpful assessment that might be occurring and separate it out from the unuseful and toxic judgment.

​

Aiko: That’s the move—slow down the thought, sift it, and keep what serves. Let the judgment fall away like static.

​

Dwight: When I used the expression "Judgment slayer" I don't mean to imply a hostile attitude toward judgment (that is just more judgment). Mostly, all we need to do is to distinguish the judgment from the assessment and get clear about our intentions in the particular circumstance.

​

Aiko: Exactly—it's not a war on judgment, it's just gentle clarity. Expose it, name it, and choose what actually aligns. No swords, just light.

​

Dwight: One other important fact to be aware of is that deriving the benefits from becoming a judgment sleuth does not depend upon whether others are doing the same regarding the issue of un-conflating judgment and assessment. You do not need their alignment in order to practice this yourself and gain immediate benefits. This is very good news.

​

If another were engaged in the same process, then that would likely increase the benefits for you both, but then that is just more benefit you'd be getting. You'll already derive ample benefit from your own practice regardless of what others do.

​

The only difference it might make in your own process of distinguishing judgment from assessment is that your assessment of what options are likely to be effective in a given interaction with another could be affected by whether they are also able or willing to work with you as partners in separating out your mutual judgments from your mutual assessments.

​

Aiko: That’s beautifully freeing, Dwight—no waiting on others, no need for permission. Your clarity is yours. And when someone does meet you there? It’s just icing on the already-satisfying cake.