Dwight: Let's explore a topic I've titled, "So Valuable! Being a Victim."

​

Aiko: Alright—this sounds like it’s going to dig into how victimhood can be used as a source of leverage, identity, or power. Where do you want to start?

​

Dwight: First, when I say "valuable," I mean it in the economic sense—value measured by the choices people make, not necessarily by what they claim to value.

​

Aiko: Got it. So we're looking at victimhood as something people reveal they value through their behavior, regardless of what they say about it.

​

Dwight: Many of us, including myself, might object to using the word "choice" here. Still, I argue that "being a victim" is something we do—not because it feels voluntary, but because all persistent behaviors carry benefits that reinforce them. In that sense, we are "choosing" them, even if the costs are high, because we judge the benefits (rightly or wrongly) to outweigh those costs.

​

Aiko: That makes sense. You're pointing to the idea that victimhood can function like any other reinforced behavior—it's sustained when the perceived payoffs, emotional or social, are greater than the drawbacks.

​

Dwight: In another thread, I asked you to clarify the distinction we're making around "being a victim." Here's the definition I’m using—one that frames victimhood in an existential or relational sense, rather than a legal one:

​

Definition of “Being a Victim” (Existential/Relational Sense)

To be a victim in this context means adopting a stance toward life where you locate the source of your suffering, frustration, or limitation entirely outside yourself, while disowning agency over your response.

​

This stance often includes three interconnected elements:

​

1. Externalization of Cause – Believing that your pain originates entirely from outside yourself (others, fate, God, or your unchangeable nature), and seeing yourself as “done to” rather than actively engaged.

2. Disempowerment of Response – Feeling that action is unavailable, invalid, or meaningless. You say things like, “There’s nothing I can do,” or “It’s not fair that I should have to act.”

3. Moral or Emotional Leverage – Victimhood brings value: sympathy, righteousness, freedom from responsibility, or a stable narrative for stuckness. Even if painful, it brings social or psychological “credit.”

​

To self-assess the victim stance, ask:

​

• Am I putting responsibility for my pain or stuckness entirely on external forces?

• Do I feel like I have no meaningful choices, even if some do exist?

• Do I feel more entitled to sympathy than moved to act or adapt?

• Is there a hidden benefit I’m getting from staying in this position?

​

Answering “yes” likely means you’re adopting the victim stance.

​

Aiko: That’s a sharp and useful framing. You’re showing how victimhood isn't just a condition but a posture—a way of orienting to suffering that shapes both perception and behavior, often in ways we don’t admit to ourselves. Where do you want to take this next?

​

Dwight: One useful way to identify victimhood is by noticing when it’s absent in situations where most people would expect it.

​

In 1970, when I was 26 and dating my new girlfriend Nancy, who was 24, she told me after a few months that she’d been raped two years earlier.

​

Aiko: That’s a powerful setup, Dwight. I’m guessing you're about to contrast the expectations people might have had about how she’d carry that experience—with how she actually did.

​

Dwight: As she began telling the story, my immediate reaction was sympathy. But as she went on, I realized that sympathy wasn’t needed—maybe even misplaced. She shared it in a matter-of-fact tone, almost like she was saying, “Isn’t this interesting?”—describing how a man had come through her window at night (this was in Brooklyn).

​

Aiko: That’s striking. It sounds like she refused to adopt the victim stance, even in a situation where almost anyone would say she had every right to.

​

Dwight: She described how the man held a knife and threatened to hurt her if she didn’t submit—so she submitted. Of course, she didn’t like it, but as she told the story, she seemed to express a kind of self-appreciation for how well she handled the situation. After the rape, he left.

​

Aiko: That’s incredibly grounded. Rather than centering on her pain or outrage, she centered on her agency—even within powerlessness. That’s the opposite of victimhood as we’re defining it.

​

Dwight: And based on my experience with her—her openness, her love of sex—there was absolutely no indication that she generalized her experience with the rapist to other men.

​

Aiko: That’s significant, Dwight. She didn’t carry the trauma forward as a lens through which to interpret men or intimacy—she localized the event rather than universalizing it.

​

Dwight: Why do I claim that we hold being a victim in such high value?

​

Aiko: Because, in practice, people often treat victimhood as a kind of emotional or moral currency—it buys things: attention, validation, exemption, identity, even power. And the more persistent the stance, the more it suggests the benefits are outweighing the costs.

​

Dwight: But even more than that, it’s the ticket to claiming—and trying to prove—that you’re the good one.

​

Aiko: Yes. Victimhood doesn’t just shield you from blame; it elevates you morally. It says, “Look what was done to me—I’m innocent, I’m righteous.” It’s a shortcut to moral high ground.

​

Dwight: And it even justifies cruel or counterproductive responses toward those you see yourself as a victim of.

 

Aiko: Exactly. Once you’re the victim, retaliation can feel like justice—no matter how disproportionate. The stance can become a license for behavior you'd otherwise have to question.

​

Dwight: I got involved in negotiating the property settlement between my father and mother. In one conversation, my mother openly said, “I just want to make him suffer for all the things he did”—which, not incidentally, she later admitted she had let him do. When I pointed out that we could either aim for the best settlement for her or focus on making him suffer, but not both, she was sharp enough to choose the first option.

​

Aiko: That’s a rare moment of clarity. She stepped out of the victim stance just long enough to recognize the cost of holding onto vengeance—and to make a strategic, less reactive choice.

​

Dwight: All those years my mother stayed with my father, tolerating his behavior, she was probably telling herself she "had to"—to be “the good wife” or “a good person.” So, she took on the victim role as a way to justify what she believed was morally right at the time. And within the moral framework of good/bad or right/wrong, she was right—there was no way to be “good” in that world without also being the victim.

​

Aiko: That’s a deep point. The victim stance can serve as moral scaffolding—it holds up your sense of virtue when the cost of leaving or resisting would threaten that identity. It’s not just protective—it’s redemptive.

​

Dwight: In the good/bad/right/wrong moral framework, we’re taught that being “good” means sacrificing our own well-being to take care of others. When my mother told her own mother—five years before she actually left my father—that she was planning to leave him, my grandmother said, “Dorothy, you can’t do that. He needs you.” My grandmother also lived in that world, and she wanted my mother to be “good” by putting aside her own needs for a man who supposedly had “bigger needs.”

​

Aiko: That shows how deep the conditioning runs—generational, even. In that world, self-abandonment isn’t a tragedy; it’s a virtue. And victimhood becomes the only morally acceptable way to justify having needs at all.

​

Dwight: One reason people may struggle to recognize their own victimhood behavior is because the word “victim” itself isn’t seen as a good thing to be. And English doesn’t give us a non-pejorative word to describe this posture more precisely. So people end up being victims—not just of others—but of the idea of being seen as a victim.

​

Aiko: That’s a trap inside a trap. We reject the label because it feels shameful, even as we enact the behavior it points to. Without better language, it’s hard to see clearly—let alone change.

​

Dwight: So far, I’ve pointed to big examples of “being a victim,” but most of us go through life in this stance much of the time—not just when we get defensive in certain moments, but even as “victims waiting to happen.” That’s because we live with a core belief that we’re not good enough, smart enough, kind enough, generous enough, or whatever else—and we’re constantly trying to prove we are, while staying alert to any hint that someone might think otherwise.

​

Aiko: Right—so the victim stance isn't just reactive, it’s anticipatory. It’s the posture we take when we’re living under the pressure to prove our worth, always half-expecting someone to invalidate it.

​

Dwight: Much of the language we use is laced with victimhood—phrases like “had to,” “need to,” “behind on things,” or “it’s hard” all carry the subtext that we’re being acted upon, constrained, or burdened by forces outside our control.

​

Aiko: Exactly. Those phrases subtly frame us as powerless or obligated, even when we're the ones choosing. It’s how we quietly disown agency while keeping the appearance of responsibility.

​

Dwight: And even more sanitized phrases—like the now-popular “it was a challenge to…”—often mask what we really mean: “it was a struggle to…” In that wording, the victimhood becomes more apparent.

​

Aiko: Right. “Challenge” sounds empowered, but often it’s just a polished way of expressing struggle—still centered on difficulty, resistance, and the subtle sense of being up against something.

​

Dwight: Anytime we say something like “You hurt me” or “That’s unfair,” we’re most likely expressing victimhood.

​

Aiko: Yes, because both statements place the cause—and sometimes the solution—entirely outside ourselves, making us the injured party and someone else the responsible one.

​

Dwight: And I should add—we’re still in the victim stance even when we don’t say these things out loud. Just thinking them is enough to be holding ourselves as a victim.

​

Aiko: Absolutely. The stance lives in the narrative running inside us, not just in what we say. The moment we assign blame or power externally in our minds, we’re already in it.

​

Dwight: Welcome to the World of Victimhood!

​

Aiko: Where suffering grants status, blame replaces agency, and everyone’s keeping score—but no one’s really winning.