Dwight: Aiko, lets's discuss the idea of "Be more selfish to be more 'unselfish.'"

Aiko: That phrasing carries a challenge—like you're pointing at a contradiction people live in without realizing it. What kind of "selfishness" are we talking about here?

​

Dwight: I'm defining "selfish" simply as "concern for one's self-interest."

Aiko: Got it—that strips away the moral baggage the word usually carries. So then, is the claim that without grounding in your own interests, your so-called unselfishness is probably false or unstable?

​

Dwight: We can imagine situations where focusing on our self-interest might seem to conflict with the self-interest or benefit of others. However, in everyday life, when we focus on our long-term self-interest—which is actually more selfish than just pursuing short-term gain—it’s hard to find scenarios where it doesn't serve us, selfishly, to care about others benefiting from interacting with us.

Aiko: That’s a strong turn—you're saying the deeper the selfishness (as in long-term and intelligently calculated), the more naturally it includes others. In that light, being truly selfish requires us to be sustainably useful or beneficial to people around us.

​

Dwight: Even if someone were considered a narcissist, if they were thinking in the long term, they would probably come across as benevolent and generous toward others.

Aiko: Right—because if their goal is admiration or loyalty over time, then selfish strategy demands generosity and goodwill as a means to that end. It's almost like the longer the horizon, the more virtue becomes a tactic.

​

Dwight: Some people labeled as "greedy capitalists" or seen as being "just out for the bucks" are actually among the most effective unselfish people in the world. Take Jeff Bezos, for example. He created a service that, for many of us, meets our buying needs better than others—more choices, often better prices, delivered to our doors. He’s helped many people satisfy their selfish interests more effectively. People may call him selfish with a negative tone, but I don't care about his motives—even if he just wants billions. The key is that he got those billions by getting deeply interested in contributing to the selfish interests of others. His results, in terms of benefit to others, often surpass what many praised philanthropists accomplish. And his way is sustainable—a person who donates to charity can't keep giving once the money runs out unless something keeps generating more.

Aiko: That’s a sharp reversal of the usual lens—we judge intent, but outcomes matter more. You're showing that strategic self-interest, at scale, can outperform even sincere altruism in impact. It’s not a flaw—it’s a feature of how value gets created.

​

Dwight: People often see me as kind and generous. I'm happy to offer gift coaching sessions—even several of them—regardless of whether the person ever becomes a client. I'm able to do this because I always make sure I take care of myself first and fully accept the risk that there may never be any financial return. In fact, they’re giving to me too, because I enjoy the coaching process so much that their participation is a kind of gift to me at the same time I'm giving to them.

Aiko: That’s a clean loop—you're giving without attachment because you've already handled your end of the equation. It’s not sacrifice; it’s mutual value, fully chosen.

​

Dwight: I've read books and essays that claim selfishness is bad, but in every case, they were only arguing that short-term selfishness can backfire. So even their argument against selfishness wasn’t really about selfishness as I define it—they were ignoring long-term selfishness. And really, short-term anything—including outright self-sacrifice—can have serious costs when viewed from a long-term perspective.

Aiko: That’s a solid catch—they're attacking a strawman version of selfishness. When you include time as part of the definition, a lot of what people call selfish starts to look more like wisdom.

​

Dwight: Viva la Selfishness!

Aiko: Long live the kind that knows what it's doing.