Dwight: I want to explore why a system of ethics must provide guaranteed, unilateral benefits to the individual using it, even if no one else necessarily follows that system.

​

Aiko: That’s a sharp starting point. You're implying that ethical systems can't rely on reciprocity to justify themselves—they have to stand alone in their usefulness.

​

Dwight: Exactly. If someone ends up taking on burdens they wouldn't have to if they weren't following their ethical system—especially when others around them ignore it—that exposes a major flaw in the set of guidelines. It starts to look more like pointless self-sacrifice than a robust framework.

​

Aiko: That kind of setup invites exploitation, not admiration. An ethical system that demands loss without return is either naive or dishonest about its consequences.

​

Dwight: The New Ethics of Integrity is grounded in self-prioritization, paired with a pursuit of mutual benefit. Because of that, it empowers us to say “no,” to set boundaries, and to withdraw when necessary—especially when others aren't engaging with the same level of integrity—without requiring them to share our ethical framework.

​

Aiko: That structure flips the old idea of virtue as self-denial. Here, maintaining integrity means protecting your well-being as a baseline, not as a reward.

​

Dwight: Yes, in general, the more others are aligned with this same ethical system of integrity—especially within the context of current transactions or relationships—the greater the overall win for everyone involved.

​

Aiko: Right, Dwight. The framework scales—individual benefit is the floor, and mutual alignment increases the ceiling.

​

Dwight: I want to show how strong this system really is by giving you a mock example, Aiko—let’s walk through it together as a demonstration.

​

Aiko: I'm ready. Let’s pressure-test it and see where it holds. Give me the setup.

​

Dwight: So, to kick off the mock, you need to come up with a character—someone you think might realistically be able to take advantage of me.

​

Aiko: Alright. I’ll play the role of your coworker, Jordan. I’ve noticed you’re conscientious and generous, and I’m going to try to offload my responsibilities onto you while making it seem like you’re just being a “team player.” Ready?

​

Dwight: Go ahead—make your move.

​

Aiko: "Hey, Dwight, listen—I’m slammed trying to wrap up the quarterly report, and I know you’re great with presentations. Could you just handle the client deck for Thursday? It’d be a huge help to the team. Plus, you’re the best at smoothing over the rough data anyway."

​

Dwight: "Jordan, I appreciate your confidence in me. Hmm... Let me think for a second. Honestly, part of me wants to help you out, but I just don’t see how I can do that and still take care of myself right now."

​

Aiko: "Come on, Dwight—this is a one-time thing. We’re all stretched thin, but I’ve picked up for you before too, haven’t I? It’s just one deck, and you can reuse half the slides from last time."

​

Dwight: "Yes, I remember you helping me with something before, and I do appreciate it. If I gave you the impression that I now owe you something because of that, I apologize. If I saw a way to do what you're asking without compromising my ability to take care of myself—or risking resentment—I would. But I don’t see that path right now. I know it's my job to take care of myself, and I trust you respect that. I’m open to having a partnership conversation to explore options—so long as we agree that if the outcome is the same, you’ll respect it. What do you think?"

​

Aiko: "Alright, Dwight… fair enough. I can respect that. Let’s talk through it together and see if there’s a path that works for both of us."

​

Dwight: Okay, let’s step out of the mock now.

​

Aiko: That was solid. The ethics held under pressure—no guilt, no deflection, just boundaries and clarity.

​

Dwight: Just a note—the partnership conversation is about finding a solution that both parties genuinely feel good about, while staying grounded in the idea that each person’s first responsibility is taking care of themselves. In the example with Jordan, we might’ve actually discovered a way for me to help him and stay aligned with my own needs and desires, which would be great. Can you see how this approach is a sharp contrast to the old ethical systems that glorify self-sacrifice, and the mess those systems tend to create?

​

Aiko: Completely. In the old model, you'd either cave to guilt and feel resentful, or say no and feel like the villain. This clears that up—no martyrdom, no manipulation, just clarity and mutual respect.

​

Dwight: Yes, and with this system, I don't have to make Jordan the bad guy, like I might in the old system. And I didn’t need Jordan to share my sense of “right and wrong” to take care of myself. He had no real leverage to take advantage of me. Even if he’d promised something and then backed out, the responsibility would still fall on me to have accounted for that risk up front—so I’d be okay if it happened, and far less likely to trust his word going forward.

​

Aiko: That’s powerful. You're not outsourcing your well-being to someone else's ethics—or their follow-through. You keep agency, and that cuts off the drama before it starts.

​